Downtown Cincinnati, in an area known as "Over the Rhine", has long been an area of poverty containing empty and rundown buildings. The city of Cincinnati wishes to use this area to create new businesses and spark economic development. Would the eminent domain power allow the city to take this property from the building owners for the purpose of economic rejuvenation and elimination of "blight" within the city? What U.S. Supreme Court case would serveDowntown Cincinnati, in an area known as "Over the Rhine", has long been an area of poverty containing empty and rundown buildings. The city of Cincinnati wishes to use this area to create new businesses and spark economic development. Would the eminent domain power allow the city to take this property from the building owners for the purpose of economic rejuvenation and elimination of "blight" within the city? What U.S. Supreme Court case would serve as precedent for this issue? as precedent for this issue?

The federal gov't may seize privately owned land against the use of public purposes by applying adverse possession control as well as the owner is paid at either the fair price for both the property taken either by the state as well as the federal government. Everything was introduced throughout the U.S. Constitution's fifth amendment.
Let's all appreciate the point that, in this situation, the consideration is that sometimes the property is conducted again for purposes of the industrial zone including market growth in which the property may well be provided to companies for economic enterprise, and this does not count for public purposes, and thus the community isn't allowed to obtain such property.

The United States supreme court can apply Berman Vs. Parker 348, U.S./1954 as either a case on that whole concern that can prohibit the town of Cincinnati's purchase rights.